Home > electronics, photo > The obsession with small

The obsession with small

Olympus E-420I noticed anandtech has an article about the Olympus E-420 titled ‘Olympus E-420: World’s Smallest Digital SLR‘. Why are electronics companies so obsessed with making everything smaller? Mini, nano, it’s always smaller than the last version. Is this another race like the megaherts battle of CPU speeds or the megapixel count of digital camera’s? To borrow a phrase from elsewhere, size isn’t important. Ergonomics and ease of use are.

It’s fine to make a tiny pocket sized digital camera when the buttons are on a touch sensitive screen since they aren’t crammed into every piece of available space. Same with a pocket music player like the iPod touch. Some things just don’t work as well when they are shrunk too far. A couple of years ago I bought a Nikon D50 Digital SLR camera. The choice at the time was between a D50 and the Canon 350, and until I tried both camera’s the Canon 350 had the edge. As soon as I laid hands on them the Nikon was the only one for me. It just felt comfortable in my hands, all the controls were where my fingers fell. The Canon was too small, my pinkie fell under the body and the controls felt cramped. So here’s an idea. Instead of offering different colours how about consumer electronics are sold in different sizes for different ages and levels of manual dexterity?

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: